|
|
|
Charter 2006 - 2008
By M. Debney
2 Jun 2008, 10:12
SOUTH WELLINGTON INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL
¡§Act well your part. There all the honour lies.¡¨
Reviewed Term One, 2008
At SWIS we believe in:
Taking responsibility
Striving for excellence
The right to learn
All students learning successfully
Celebrating success
Having fun
Multiculturalism
Teamwork
Pride in our school
Open and frank communication
Three Year Development Strategy 2006 - 2008
This is a ¡§rolling¡¨ plan. Each year¡¦s strategic goals are confirmed prior to the commencement of the year. Strategic goals for subsequent years are tentative pending ¡§opportunities¡¨ adjustments and confirmation at the commencement of the year. Appropriate documentation for each goal are provided in Annual plans.
|
GOAL TITLE |
GOALS |
EST.
COST |
LEADERSHIP |
2006
Confirmed |
2007
Confirmed |
2008
Confirmed |
|
Literacy |
To develop, implement, monitor and review programmes and practices that strengthen literacy throughout the school.
|
$12,000 |
Mrs. Tristram |
* |
|
|
|
Mathematics |
To embed and sustain the Numeracy programme throughout the school.
|
$2,500 |
Miss Sangster |
* |
|
|
|
New Curriculum
Initiative |
To identify a new curriculum area for further development in 2008.
* The school is undertaking an action research project examining Key Competencies, particularly Managing Self. |
$3,400
EHSAS funding |
Mr. Debney |
|
|
* |
|
Sunsmart
|
To implement a school-wide Sunsmart programme.
|
$5,000 |
Board
Property
Committee |
* |
|
|
|
Technological Developments |
To investigate technological developments to further enhance teaching and learning.
|
$0 |
Mr. Debney |
|
* |
|
|
Physical Environment |
To further enhance the attractiveness and appeal of the school environment.
|
$8,000 |
Board Property Committee |
* |
|
|
Three Year Governance Strategy 2006 - 2008
|
Triennial Effectiveness Review Programme (NAG 2) |
|
(B=Board, S=Staff, P=Principal) |
Year 1 2006 |
Year 2 2007 |
Year 3 2008 |
|
Title |
Review
Leader |
Who |
Freq. |
Term
1 |
Term
2 |
Term
3 |
Term
4 |
Term
1 |
Term
2 |
Term
3 |
Term
4 |
Term
1 |
Term
2 |
Term
3 |
Term
4 |
|
Terms of Reference |
L.
McBain |
B |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delegations
|
L.
McBain |
B |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAG 1
Curriculum |
M. Debney |
B
+ |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
NAG 2
Self Review |
L.
McBain |
B |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
NAG 3
Personnel |
L. Daysh |
C |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAG 4 Sect. 1
Property |
E. Jones |
C |
Triennial |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAG 4 Sect. 2
Finance |
M. Debney |
C |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
NAG 5
Safe Environ. |
D.
Guja |
C |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAG 6
Administration |
L. McBain |
C |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
Treaty of
Waitangi |
L.
McBain |
B |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Committees reviewed (March 2008).
CURRICULUM All BOT, staff senior management SELF REVIEW All BOT members
PERSONNEL M. Debney, P. O¡¦Connell, R. Parbhu, L. McBain, L Daysh PROPERTY M. Debney, P. O¡¦Connell, D. Guja, L. Daysh, E. Jones, B. White, A. Cannell
FINANCE E. Jones, M. Debney ADMINISTRATION Lynn McBain, M. Debney
TREATY OF WAITANGI All BOT members SAFE ENVIRONMENT L. McBain, B. White, D. Guja, P. O¡¦Connell.
Annual Charter Plan 2008
For advancing student achievement through school performance and resource management*
|
GOAL TITLE |
GOALS |
2008 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES |
2008 RESULTS |
|
Literacy
|
To develop, implement, monitor and review programmes and practices that strengthen literacy throughout the school. |
¡P Teachers will model good reading and listening strategies, using a wide variety of texts, as well as integrating these with other topics.
¡P Teachers will plan interesting and effective reading programmes which actively involve students and address their specific needs.
¡P Teachers will develop an increased knowledge of how readers read, the reading process and the deliberate instructional practices which lead to student acquisition of the reading process, including the transfer of these skills to other areas.
¡P Teachers will develop an increased knowledge of the writing process and the deliberate instructional practices which lead to student acquisition of the writing skills, including the transfer of these skills to other areas.
¡P Teachers will effectively assess reading and writing using a variety of tools to gather, analyse and use the data to assist future planning and learning goals.
¡P Home ¡V school reading links will be promoted. |
|
|
Mathematics
|
To embed and sustain the Numeracy programme throughout the school.
|
¡P Provide professional development in Numeracy to new staff members.
¡P Maintain Numeracy teaching proficiency through staff meetings and staff appraisals. |
|
|
New Curriculum
Initiative
|
To identify a new curriculum area for further development in 2008.
(This has been identified as the SWELL EHSAS project) |
¡P To work with the South Wellington cluster of ten schools to develop an effective network of learning communities, promoting and sustaining learning for all.
¡P To initiate the pilot for an action research project examining the Key Competencies of the new NZ curriculum: specifically ¡¥Managing Self¡¦.
¡P To share data and the action research experience with the SWELL cluster. |
|
|
Sunsmart |
To implement a school-wide Sunsmart programme.
|
¡P To consider property developments that increase shade areas a priority.
¡P To plant more trees to provide extra shade.
¡P To investigate other intermediate practice in relation to hats.
¡P To actively encourage the wearing of hats outside during the summer terms.
|
|
|
Technological Developments |
To investigate technological developments to further enhance teaching and learning.
|
¡P Investigate the feasibility, and recommend a form of interactive whiteboard technology.
¡P Develop a plan for the successful introduction of the new technology to selected classes and allocate budget if appropriate.
¡P Plan for introduction of new technology for all classes. |
|
|
Physical Environment |
To further enhance the attractiveness and appeal of the school environment.
|
¡P Sand, fill and polyurethane hall floor.
¡P Paint walls and ceiling of hall and develop display areas.
¡P Refurbish hall toilets and changing rooms.
¡P Review signage around the school. |
|
* The Education Standards Act (2001) stipulates three areas for goals and targets: student achievement, school performance, use of resources.
Annual improvement targets for student achievement ¡V 2006
ACTION PLAN
|
Strategic Goal 1
|
LITERACY :To develop, implement, monitor and review programmes and practices that strengthen literacy throughout the school. |
|
Annual Targets |
(i) By the end of 2006 over 85% of students will be reading at or above their age level.
(ii) For students new to New Zealand, at least 18 months progress in reading age will be made in 2006. |
|
Target Groups
(reported on)
|
¡P All students not new to New Zealand
¡P Students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here)
¡P Maori Students
¡P Pacifica Students
¡P Students identified as ¡¥at risk¡¦ |
|
Historical Position/
Rationale |
Due to the multi-cultural nature of our students, academic goals may be expressed in two parts. Part (i) will relate to all students, part (ii) will relate to students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here).
(ii) NEALE Test February and October.
November 2005 student achievement: 85.5% of students achieved stanine 4 or above and 77.7% scored stanine 5 or above. |
|
Actions |
Timing |
Responsibility |
Resourcing |
|
¡P Teachers will model good reading and listening strategies, using a wide variety of texts, as well as integrating these with other topics.
¡P Teachers will plan interesting and effective reading programmes which actively involve students and address their specific needs.
¡P Teachers will develop an increased knowledge of how readers read, the reading process and the deliberate instructional practices which lead to student acquisition of the reading process, including the transfer of these skills to other areas.
¡P Teachers will effectively assess reading using a variety of tools to gather, analyse and use the data to assist future planning and learning goals.
¡P Home ¡V school reading links will be promoted. |
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006 |
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster |
$12,000 |
|
Outcome:
Achieved/not achieved/variance report
|
In November 2006 results showed that 88% of students were reading at stanine 5. This compares with 77% at the same level in 2005. In addition the number of students achieving at stanines 1 ¡V 3 dropped from 23% in February to 7% in November. At the high stanines of 7 ¡V 9, the 23% of students who achieved this level in February became 63% in November. This was an outstanding result. |
|
|
Recommendations:
Where to from here?
|
We set a similarly high standard for 2007.
We maintain our effort with those students on stanine 1 ¡V 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual improvement targets for student achievement ¡V 2006
ACTION PLAN
|
Strategic Goal 2 |
NUMERACY : To embed and sustain the Numeracy programme throughout the school |
|
Annual Targets |
(i) By the end of 2006 all Year 8 students will have improved at least one stage in the NumPA diagnostic testing
in at least five different sections. The sections are:
¡P Addition and Subtraction Backwards Number Word Sequence
¡P Multiplication and Division Fractional Numbers
¡P Proportions and RatiosƒnƒnƒnƒnƒnƒnƒnƒnƒnƒnƒnƒnƒnƒnPlace Value
¡P Forwards Number Word Sequence Basic Facts |
|
Target Groups
(reported on)
|
- Year 8 Students and Year 7 Students (All Year 7 students will be tested with the full diagnostic test to see what improvements have been made from the IKAN test done at the beginning of the year)
- Students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here)
- Maori Students
- Pacifica Students
- Students at risk
|
|
Historical Position/
Rationale |
¡P In 2005 all Year 8 students improved by one or more levels, or remained the same. Because the diagnostic test stages stop at different stages (Addition & Subtraction, Forwards Number Word Sequence & Backwards Number Word Sequence at stage 6, Multiplication and Division at stage 7 and remainder at stage 8), it makes it difficult to predict which stages will show the greatest improvement. The Year 7s in 2005 were achieving at stage 6, with a number at stage 7. |
|
Actions |
Timing |
Responsibility |
Resourcing |
- Provide professional development in Numeracy to new staff members.
- Maintain Numeracy teaching proficiency through staff meetings Mathematics (staff sharing resources and new ideas) and staff appraisals.
|
All year
All year
|
Miss Sangster
Miss Sangster |
$2,500 |
|
Outcome:
Achieved/not achieved/variance report
|
In 2006 the improvement noticed in 2005 continued, with all Year 8 students improving by 1 or more levels, or remaining the same. None went backwards in scores. The majority of the Year 8s were achieving at Stage 6/7, with those in the top group achieving predominantly at Stage 8.The Year 7s were mostly achieving at Stage 6/7 by the end of the year, with a few achieving at Stage 8. The greatest improvements were again seen in Multiplication/Division and Proportions and Ratios, with good gains made in Place Value and Fractional Numbers. Some students made improvements of up to 3 stages ¡V the majority improved by one or two stages. |
|
|
Recommendations:
Where to from here? |
1. That we move from the NumPA diagnostic test to using the PAT Maths test to assess progress through out the school. This tool gives a broader picture of the mathematical progress of students and includes data on the other strands of the Mathematics curriculum.
2. That we watch the developments of the new curriculum document with an eye towards incorporating it into our school programme as quickly as possible after it has been gazetted.
3. That we maintain and sustain the Numeracy Project within our school programme, particularly in the lower ability classes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual improvement targets for student achievement ¡V 2007
ACTION PLAN
|
Strategic Goal 1
|
LITERACY :To develop, implement, monitor and review programmes and practices that strengthen literacy throughout the school. |
|
Annual Targets |
(i) By the end of 2007 over 85% of students will be reading at or above their age level.
(ii) For students new to New Zealand, at least 18 months progress in reading age will be made in 2007. |
|
Target Groups
(reported on)
|
¡P All students not new to New Zealand
¡P Students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here)
¡P Maori Students
¡P Pacifica Students
¡P Students identified as ¡¥at risk¡¦ |
|
Historical Position/
Rationale |
Due to the multi-cultural nature of our students, academic goals may be expressed in two parts. Part (i) will relate to all students, part (ii) will relate to students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here).
(ii) NEALE Test February and October.
November 2006 student achievement: 88% of students achieved stanine 5 or above. |
|
Actions |
Timing |
Responsibility |
Resourcing |
|
¡P Teachers will model good reading and listening strategies, using a wide variety of texts, as well as integrating these with other topics.
¡P Teachers will plan interesting and effective reading programmes which actively involve students and address their specific needs.
¡P Teachers will develop an increased knowledge of how readers read, the reading process and the deliberate instructional practices which lead to student acquisition of the reading process, including the transfer of these skills to other areas.
¡P Teachers will effectively assess reading using a variety of tools to gather, analyse and use the data to assist future planning and learning goals.
¡P Home ¡V school reading links will be promoted. |
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007 |
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster |
$8,000 |
|
Outcome:
Achieved/not achieved/variance report |
In November 2007 results showed that 74% of students were reading at stanine 5 or above. This compared very well with the 66% at the same level in February and the national average of 60%. In addition the number of students achieving at stanines 1 ¡V 3 dropped from 15% in February to 12% in November. The national average is 23%. At the high stanines of 7 ¡V 9, the 33% of students who achieved this level in February became 41% in November (National average of 23%). Although we didn¡¦t achieve our target this was an outstanding result. |
|
|
Recommendations:
Where to from here?
|
We set a similarly high standard for 2008.
We maintain our effort with those students on stanine 1 ¡V 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual improvement targets for student achievement ¡V 2007
ACTION PLAN
|
Strategic Goal 2 |
NUMERACY : To embed and sustain the Numeracy programme throughout the school |
|
Annual Targets |
By the end of 2007, 80% of all students will have improved by at least one stanine on the PAT Maths test. This would represent a very significant improvement related to age although a repeat of the test in November cannot be nationally referenced.
|
|
Target Groups
(reported on)
|
- Year 8 Students and Year 7 Students (All Year 7 students will be tested with the full diagnostic test to see what improvements have been made from the IKAN test done at the beginning of the year)
- Students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here)
- Maori Students
- Pacifica Students
- Students at risk
|
|
Historical Position/
Rationale |
¡P In 2006 all Year 8 students improved by one or more levels, or remained the same. Because the diagnostic test stages stop at different stages (Addition & Subtraction, Forwards Number Word Sequence & Backwards Number Word Sequence at stage 6, Multiplication and Division at stage 7 and remainder at stage 8), it makes it difficult to predict which stages will show the greatest improvement. The Year 7s in 2006 were achieving at stage 6, with a number at stage 7. |
|
Actions |
Timing |
Responsibility |
Resourcing |
- Provide professional development in Numeracy to new staff members.
- Maintain Numeracy teaching proficiency through staff meetings Mathematics (staff sharing resources and new ideas) and staff appraisals.
|
All year
All year
|
Miss Sangster
Miss Sangster |
$2,000 |
|
Outcome:
Achieved/not achieved/variance report |
The comparison of data showed distribution in February and November displayed a marked trend towards the upper levels. This is also borne out by the stanine summary, which shows fewer students achieving at stanines 1 to 4 (27% in November, compared with 41% in February) and more at stanines 7 to 9 (41% in November, compared with 23% in February). This shift definitely demonstrates that at least 80% of the students have improved by at least one stanine since the beginning of the year. |
|
|
Recommendations:
Where to from here? |
1. That we continue to use the PAT Maths test to assess progress through out the school. This tool gives a broad picture of the mathematical progress of students and includes data on the various strands of the Mathematics curriculum.
2. That we work to incorporate the new NZ Curriculum into our school programme and our classroom practice as quickly as practicable.
3. That we maintain and sustain the Numeracy Project within our school programme. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual improvement targets for student achievement ¡V 2008
ACTION PLAN
|
Strategic Goal 1
|
LITERACY :To develop, implement, monitor and review programmes and practices that strengthen literacy throughout the school. |
|
Annual Targets |
(i) By the end of 2008 over 80% of students will be reading at or above their age level.
(ii) For students new to New Zealand, at least 18 months progress in reading age will be made in 2008. |
|
Target Groups
(reported on)
|
¡P All students not new to New Zealand
¡P Students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here)
¡P Maori Students
¡P Pacifica Students
¡P Students identified as ¡¥at risk¡¦ |
|
Historical Position/
Rationale |
Due to the multi-cultural nature of our students, academic goals may be expressed in two parts. Part (i) will relate to all students, part (ii) will relate to students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here).
(ii) NEALE Test February and October.
November 2007 student achievement: 74% of students achieved stanine 5 or above. |
|
Actions |
Timing |
Responsibility |
Resourcing |
|
¡P Teachers will model good reading and listening strategies, using a wide variety of texts, as well as integrating these with other topics.
¡P Teachers will plan interesting and effective reading programmes which actively involve students and address their specific needs.
¡P Teachers will develop an increased knowledge of how readers read, the reading process and the deliberate instructional practices which lead to student acquisition of the reading process, including the transfer of these skills to other areas.
¡P Teachers will develop an increased knowledge of the writing process and the deliberate instructional practices which lead to student acquisition of the writing skills, including the transfer of these skills to other areas.
¡P Teachers will effectively assess reading using a variety of tools to gather, analyse and use the data to assist future planning and learning goals.
¡P Home ¡V school reading links will be promoted. |
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008 |
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster
Mrs. Tristram/Miss Sangster |
$6,000 |
|
Outcome:
Achieved/not achieved/variance report |
|
|
|
Recommendations:
Where to from here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual improvement targets for student achievement ¡V 2008
ACTION PLAN
|
Strategic Goal 2 |
NUMERACY : To embed and sustain the Numeracy programme throughout the school |
|
Annual Targets |
By the end of 2008, 80% of all students will have improved by at least one stanine on the PAT Maths test. This would represent a very significant improvement related to age although a repeat of the test in November cannot be nationally referenced.
|
|
Target Groups
(reported on)
|
- Year 8 Students and Year 7 Students (All Year 7 students will be tested with the full diagnostic test to see what improvements have been made from the IKAN test done at the beginning of the year)
- Students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here)
- Maori Students
- Pacifica Students
- Students at risk
|
|
Historical Position/
Rationale |
In 2006 all Year 8 students improved by one or more levels, or remained the same. Because the diagnostic test stages stop at different stages (Addition & Subtraction, Forwards Number Word Sequence & Backwards Number Word Sequence at stage 6, Multiplication and Division at stage 7 and remainder at stage 8), it makes it difficult to predict which stages will show the greatest improvement. The Year 7s in 2006 were achieving at stage 6, with a number at stage 7.
In 2007 using the PAT Mathematics in February and October. Although the October test is not nationally referenced, we felt it did give a valuable insight into ¡¥added value¡¦ in Mathematics. |
|
Actions |
Timing |
Responsibility |
Resourcing |
- Provide professional development in Numeracy to new staff members.
- Maintain Numeracy teaching proficiency through staff meetings Mathematics (staff sharing resources and new ideas) and staff appraisals.
|
All year
All year
|
Miss Sangster
Miss Sangster |
$400 |
|
Outcome:
Achieved/not achieved/variance report |
|
|
|
Recommendations:
Where to from here? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Procedural Information: Action timeline 2008
The Board Year - 2008
Term 1
|
When |
What |
Who |
Notes |
January
1 Jan |
Instalment 1 operating funding
|
|
|
4 Feb |
Term 1 begins |
|
|
February
13
|
BOT meeting @7.00pm. Appoint New Chairperson
STAR Testing
PAT testing |
Chairperson/BOT
|
|
March
08
10
31
|
Roll return due at MOE.
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
Principal appraisal
Charter: Analysis of Variance for previous year completed included with Accounts to Auditor (Statutory Requirement) |
Principal
Chairperson/BOT
Financial Provider |
Also needs to be signed off by BOT Chair or nominated member.
BOT could consider minuting approval of Draft Annual Report and give Principal/Chairperson authority to sign off |
April
1
11
14
|
Charter: 2008 Targets in place
Instalment 2 operating funding
Intermediate Schools Summit, Auckland
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
Self Review NAG 6, Administration
End of school Planning cycle |
Principal / Staff
Principal
Principal
Chairperson/BOT
Chairperson/principal |
Charter updated for 2008 Annual Plan/Targets approved by BOT, copy sent to MOE, Lower Hutt
Principal in Auckland
|
|
18 April |
Term 1 ends |
|
|
Term 2
|
When |
What |
Who |
Notes |
05 May |
Term 2 begins |
|
|
|
May
12
31 |
.
BOT Meeting @ 7.00pm
4 copies of audited financial statement and Analysis of Variance and list of BOT members to MOE, local office. |
Chairperson/BOT
Chairperson/Principal |
Refer to ¡¥FISH¡¦ handbook for reports required. |
June
02
09
|
Queens Birthday
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
Self Review NAG 4 Sect. 2, Finance
Self Review Treaty of Waitangi |
Chairperson/BOT
Principal/Finance committee
BOT |
|
July
01
04 |
Installment 3 operating funding
July Roll Return submitted
Interim Reports home. |
Principal
Principal |
|
|
04 July |
Term 2 ends |
|
|
Term 3
|
When |
What |
Who |
Notes |
21 July |
Term 3 begins |
|
|
July
29-30
|
Parent interviews |
Principal |
|
|
August
04-08
11
|
Cultural Festival
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
|
Principal/Staff
BOT
|
|
|
September
10 - 12
08
|
Ski Trip
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
Self Review NAG 1, Curriculum
Self Review NAG 2, Self Review
Notification of provisional staffing and funding for 2008. |
Principal
Chairperson/BOT
Principal/Staff/Curriculum Committee
BOT |
|
26 Sept |
Term 3 ends |
|
|
Term 4
|
When |
What |
Who |
Notes |
1 October
13 October |
Instalment 4 operating funding
Term 4 begins |
|
|
October
20
27 |
Last day for review of provisional staffing for 2008.
Beginning work on 2008 budget.
BOT Meeting
Self Review: Finance
STAR testing
Labour Day |
Principal
BOT/Principal/Financial Provider |
|
November
10
15
Mid November
17 ¡V 21
24 - 28 |
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
Last day for staffing and funding increases for 2008
End of Year Payroll advice to Pay Serve.
Resolution Bay, Camp 1
Resolution Bay, Camp 2 |
Chairperson/BOT
Principal
Principal |
|
December
08 Dec
15
16
31 |
Start of year Payroll advice to Pay Serve.
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
Confirm 2009 Budget
Picnic Day
Prize-giving
Last date for Charter to MOE. |
Principal
Chairperson/BOT
Principal
Principal |
|
17 Dec |
Last Day of school year. |
|
Supporting Documents
2008 budget
|
|