|
|
|
CHARTER 2009 – 2011 Reviewed February 2010
By M. Debney
4 Mar 2010, 10:25
SOUTH WELLINGTON INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL
“Act well your part. There all the honour lies.”
Reviewed February 2010
At SWIS we believe in:
Taking responsibility Striving for excellence
The right to learn All students learning successfully
Celebrating success Having fun
Multiculturalism Teamwork
Pride in our school Open and frank communication
Self respect and respect for others Attempting new experiences and facing challenges
Maori Language and Culture
We believe in raising the awareness of all our students to the significance of Maori Language and Culture within our country. We do this by:
- Weekly Te Reo lessons for all students
- A formal school greeting for honoured guests in the form of a powhiri.
- A multi-cultural group considered an elite group within the school who perform at all appropriate school events.
- An extension Maori language class to maintain the language of speakers of Te Reo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Assessment information will be strengthened to inform teaching and learning, and enhance ways the data can be reported to the board and parents using eTAP software.
· The special needs policy and procedures will be reviewed to ensure that all students identified on the special needs register are accurately tracked and invention programmes used, are clearly identified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· The board will seek further improvement in their understanding of strategic planning and self review processes and how to use this to inform ongoing school improvement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Year Development Strategy 2009- 2011
This is a “rolling” plan. Each year’s strategic goals are confirmed prior to the commencement of the year. Strategic goals for subsequent years are tentative pending “opportunities” adjustments and confirmation at the commencement of the year. Appropriate documentation for each goal are provided in Annual plans.
|
GOAL TITLE |
GOALS |
EST.
COST |
LEADERSHIP |
2009
Confirmed |
2010
Confirmed |
2011
Provisional |
|
Literacy |
To develop, implement, monitor and review programmes and practices that strengthen literacy throughout the school.
|
$10,000 |
Mrs. Smith |
* |
* |
|
|
Mathematics |
To embed and sustain the Numeracy programme throughout the school.
|
$2,500 |
Miss Sangster |
* |
* |
|
|
eTAP |
To further explore ways to strengthen the use of assessment information to inform teaching and learning, and ways that achievement data can be reported to the board and parents using eTAP software.
|
$5,000 |
Mr. Debney |
* |
* |
|
|
Special needs |
To review the special needs policy and procedures to ensure that all students identified on the special needs register are accurately tracked and intervention programmes used, are clearly identified.
|
$0 |
Mrs. Tristram |
* |
* |
|
|
Curriculum
Initiative
EHSAS |
The school is undertaking an action research project examining Key Competencies, particularly Managing Self. |
$8,400
EHSAS funding |
Mr. Debney |
* |
* |
|
|
National Standards |
To implement the legislative requirements for National Standards. |
$0 |
Mr. Debney |
|
* |
|
|
Engagement with community |
To enable school community sectors to become actively involved in our school and students learning.
|
$5,000 |
Mr. Pat O’Connell |
* |
* |
|
|
Sunsmart
|
To implement a school-wide Sunsmart programme.
|
$5,000 |
Board
Property
Committee |
* |
* |
|
|
Technological Developments |
To complete the installation on interactive whiteboards in all teaching spaces
|
$35,000 |
Mr. Debney |
* |
* |
|
|
Physical Environment |
To further enhance the attractiveness and appeal of the school environment.
|
$8,000 |
Board Property Committee |
* |
* |
|
Three Year Governance Strategy 2009 – 2011
|
Triennial Effectiveness Review Programme (NAG 2) |
|
(B=Board, S=Staff, P=Principal) |
Year 1 2009 |
Year 2 2010 |
Year 3 2011 |
|
Title |
Review
Leader |
Who |
Freq. |
Term
1 |
Term
2 |
Term
3 |
Term
4 |
Term
1 |
Term
2 |
Term
3 |
Term
4 |
Term
1 |
Term
2 |
Term
3 |
Term
4 |
|
Terms of Reference |
L. Daysh |
B |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delegations
|
L. Daysh |
B |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAG 1
Curriculum |
M. Debney |
B
+ |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
NAG 2
Self Review |
L. Daysh |
B |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
NAG 3
Personnel |
L. Daysh |
C |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAG 4 Sect. 1
Property |
M. Debney |
C |
Triennial |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAG 4 Sect. 2
Finance |
M. Debney |
C |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
NAG 5
Safe Environ. |
M. Debney |
C |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAG 6
Administration |
L. Daysh |
C |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
Treaty of
Waitangi |
L. Daysh |
B |
Triennial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Committees reviewed (August 2010).
CURRICULUM All BOT, staff senior management SELF REVIEW All BOT members
PERSONNEL M. Debney, P. O’Connell, A. Kelly, L Daysh PROPERTY M. Debney, P. O’Connell, L. Daysh, A. Cannell
FINANCE A. Kelly, M. Debney ADMINISTRATION M. Menzies, L. Daysh, M. Debney
TREATY OF WAITANGI All BOT members SAFE ENVIRONMENT M. Menzies, M. Priest, P. O’Connell.
Annual Charter Plan 2009
For advancing student achievement through school performance and resource management*
|
GOAL TITLE |
GOALS |
2009 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES |
2009 RESULTS |
|
Literacy
|
To develop, implement, monitor and review programmes and practices that strengthen literacy throughout the school. |
· Teachers will model good writing strategies, using a wide variety of texts, as well as integrating these with other topics.
· Teachers will plan interesting and effective writing programmes which actively involve students and address their specific needs.
· Teachers will develop an increased knowledge of how writers write, the writing process and the deliberate instructional practices which lead to student acquisition of the writing process, including the transfer of these skills to other areas.
· Teachers will maintain their increased knowledge of the reading process and the deliberate instructional practices which lead to student acquisition of the reading skills, including the transfer of these skills to other areas.
· Teachers will effectively assess reading and writing using a variety of tools to gather, analyse and use the data to assist future planning and learning goals.
· Home – school reading links will be promoted. |
The school-wide professional development area in Literacy was begun in 2006. The first stage was development in Reading which continued into the middle of 2008. Since then the focus has been on Writing. The professional development initiated has seen strong development in Literacy with very pleasing ‘value added’ to students learning.
At the beginning of 2009 a new deputy principal as appointed with a special strength in Literacy and she has led our school-wide professional development since then.
This professional development will continue throughout 2010.
A home/school link has been established through a programme of early evening meetings.
|
|
Mathematics
|
To embed and sustain the Numeracy programme throughout the school.
|
· Provide professional development in Numeracy to new staff members.
· Maintain Numeracy teaching proficiency through staff meetings and staff appraisals. |
Miss Sangster, as curriculum leader attended update courses in Numeracy and informed staff through staff meetings. Further Numeracy teaching resources were purchased during the year.
|
|
eTAP |
To further explore ways to strengthen the use of assessment information to inform teaching and learning, and ways that achievement data can be reported to the board and parents using eTAP software.
|
· Further development of the use of eTAP to strengthen the use of assessment information to inform teaching and learning.
· Staff professional development to support this.
· Seek new ways for achievement data can be appropriately reported to the board and parents. |
National Standards being introduced in 2010 has added impetus to development of new ways of reporting on student progress. This development will continue into 2010 as the school meets new requirements.
|
|
Special Needs |
To review the special needs policy and procedures to ensure that all students identified on the special needs register are accurately tracked and invention programmes used, are clearly identified.
Note: Procedure 1.1.3 states ‘Special refers to high and low ability students.’ |
· The senior management team review the special needs policy and procedures.
· Ensure that all students identified on the special needs register are accurately tracked
· Ensure intervention programmes used are clearly identified. |
A review was undertaken with new ways of accurately tracking all students identified as special needs and interventions actioned.
A review of identifying Gifted and talented students was also undertaken and new procedures will be put in place during 2010.
|
|
Curriculum
Initiative
EHSAS
|
To implement the EHSAS ‘SWELL’ project during 2009 and 2010. |
· To work with the South Wellington cluster of ten schools to develop an effective network of learning communities, promoting and sustaining learning for all.
· To initiate the pilot for an action research project examining the Key Competencies of the new NZ curriculum: specifically ‘Managing Self’.
· To share data and the action research experience with the SWELL cluster. |
Funding for this was stopped by the MOE in 2009. Work on research projects continued in 2009 for completion in 2010.
Data has been shared with cluster schools to a much greater degree in 2009 and it is hoped this will continue even though the EHSAS funding has ceased. |
|
Engagement with community |
To enable school community sectors to become actively involved in our school and students learning.
|
· To identify and make contact with the leaders of the various groups within the school community.
· To consult with all school community groups about their aspirations for our school.
· To use the consultations to strengthen our school’s self review processes.
· To provide new opportunities for school community members to be actively involved in our school.
|
In 2009 we began a home/school partnership programme we called ‘Working together— Kia Kotahi Tatou.’ It features early evening meetings. Initially we are using this to support literacy strategies and will expand this in 2010 to include Mathematics and parent suggestions.
|
|
Sunsmart |
To implement a school-wide Sunsmart programme.
|
· To consider property developments that increase shade areas a priority.
· To plant more trees to provide extra shade.
· To investigate other intermediate practice in relation to hats.
· To actively encourage the wearing of hats outside during the summer terms. |
Property developments has been considered and a shade plan developed.
Funding was sought in 2009 but declined.
We will continue to seek funding. |
|
Technological Developments |
To complete the installation on interactive whiteboards in all teaching spaces
|
· Develop a plan for the successful introduction of the new technology into all teaching spaces over time and allocate budget if appropriate. |
At the end of 2009 we installed three data projectors in classrooms and one in the Science room. |
|
Physical Environment |
To further enhance the attractiveness and appeal of the school environment.
|
· To investigate the development of a performing Arts space in the changing rooms at the back of the stage in the school hall
· Review signage around the school. |
Because of cost we decided against developing a new Performing Arts at the back of the hall.
Signage was reviewed.
A new Astroturf area was developed on the top asphalt area. This has proved very successful. |
* The Education Standards Act (2001) stipulates three areas for goals and targets: student achievement, school performance, use of resources.
Annual Charter Plan 2010
For advancing student achievement through school performance and resource management*
|
GOAL TITLE |
GOALS |
2010 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES |
2010 RESULTS |
|
Literacy
|
To develop, implement, monitor and review programmes and practices that strengthen literacy throughout the school. |
· Teachers will use a wide range of instructional strategies integrating with other curriculum areas as appropriate.
· Teachers will plan interesting and effective writing programmes which actively involve students and address their specific needs.
· Teachers will implement instructional practices which lead to student acquisition of reading and writing skills.
· Teachers will effectively assess reading and writing using a variety of tools to gather, analyse and use the data to assist future planning and learning goals.
· Home – school reading links will be promoted by the programme “Working together – Kia Kotahi Tatou”.
|
|
|
Mathematics
|
To embed and sustain the Numeracy programme throughout the school.
|
· Provide professional development in Numeracy to new staff members.
· Maintain Numeracy teaching proficiency through staff meetings and staff appraisals. |
|
|
eTAP |
To further explore ways to strengthen the use of assessment information to inform teaching and learning, and ways that achievement data can be reported to the board and parents using eTAP software.
|
· Further development of the use of eTAP to strengthen the use of assessment information to inform teaching and learning.
· Staff professional development to support this.
· To link our assessment data with the National standards and be able to report to parents against the national standards.
· To modify our reports to parents to include the National standards. |
|
|
Special Needs |
To review the special needs policy and procedures to ensure that all students identified on the special needs register are accurately tracked and invention programmes used, are clearly identified.
Note: Procedure 1.1.3 states ‘Special refers to high and low ability students.’
|
· Ensure the revised procedures relating to Special Needs are followed.
· Ensure that all students identified on the special needs register are accurately tracked
· Ensure intervention programmes used are clearly identified. |
|
|
Curriculum
Initiative
EHSAS
|
To implement the EHSAS ‘SWELL’ project during 2009 and 2010. |
· Complete the action research work begun under EHSAS with presentations at the 2010 Learning Carnival Day where the action research experience will be shared with the SWELL cluster.
· This work to be completed this year unfunded.
|
|
|
National Standards |
To implement the legislative requirements for National Standards. |
· To link our assessment data with the National standards and be able to report to parents against the national standards.
· To modify our reports to parents to include the National standards. |
|
|
Engagement with community |
To enable school community sectors to become actively involved in our school and students learning.
|
· Continuing the programme “Working together – Kia Kotahi Tatou” begun in 2009 with at least one meeting per term. Parents of students with reading stanines 1-3 targeted.
· To consult with all school community groups about their aspirations for our school.
· To use the consultations to strengthen our school’s self review processes.
|
|
|
Sunsmart |
To implement a school-wide Sunsmart programme.
|
· To consider property developments that increase shade areas a priority.
· To plant more trees to provide extra shade.
· The school to provide sunblock for students to use.
· To actively encourage the wearing of hats outside during the summer terms.
· |
|
|
Technological Developments |
To complete the installation on interactive whiteboards in all teaching spaces
|
· Develop a plan for the successful introduction of the new technology into all teaching spaces over time and allocate budget if appropriate. |
|
|
Physical Environment |
To redevelop the food Technology classroom plus renovate the Technology block’s corridors and Art and Music rooms.
|
· Modernise the technology block to make it a better teaching space. Will include new equipment, tables, benches and a camera with data projector set over a demonstration table.
· Modernise other spaces named including some sound dampening in Music room. |
|
* The Education Standards Act (2001) stipulates three areas for goals and targets: student achievement, school performance, use of resources.
Annual improvement targets for student achievement – 2009
ACTION PLAN
|
Strategic Goal 1
|
LITERACY :To develop, implement, monitor and review programmes and practices that strengthen literacy throughout the school. |
|
Annual Targets |
(i) By the end of 2009 over 80% of students will be reading at or above their age level.
(ii) For students new to New Zealand, at least 18 months progress in reading age will be made in 2009. |
|
Target Groups
(reported on)
|
· All students not new to New Zealand
· Students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here)
· Maori Students
· Pacifica Students
· Students identified as ‘at risk’ |
|
Historical Position/
Rationale |
Due to the multi-cultural nature of our students, academic goals may be expressed in two parts. Part (i) will relate to all students, part (ii) will relate to students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here).
|
|
Actions |
Timing |
Responsibility |
Resourcing |
|
· Teachers will model good reading and listening strategies, using a wide variety of texts, as well as integrating these with other topics.
· Teachers will plan interesting and effective reading programmes which actively involve students and address their specific needs.
· Teachers will develop an increased knowledge of how readers read, the reading process and the deliberate instructional practices which lead to student acquisition of the reading process, including the transfer of these skills to other areas.
· Teachers will effectively assess reading using a variety of tools to gather, analyse and use the data to assist future planning and learning goals.
· Home – school reading links will be promoted. |
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009 |
Mrs. Smith
Mrs. Smith
Mrs. Smith
Mrs. Smith
Mrs. Smith
|
$12,000 |
|
Outcome:
Achieved/not achieved/variance report
|
As the target of “80% of students achieving at or above their age level”, had been met in July, it was considered unnecessary for all students to sit a 3rd STAR in November. Teachers continued to deliver high quality reading programmes and conduct less formal assessments, therefore we can reasonably expect that students throughout the school continued to make progress and develop their reading skills in the second half of the year.
|
|
|
Recommendations:
Where to from here?
|
Expect that more than 85% of students will achieve a stanine 5 or above on the STAR before the end of the year.
a. Expect that students Maori and Pasifika students will progress at a similar rate to their Pakeha peers, at all achievement levels.
b. Expect that those Maori and Pasifika students, who have no identified learning needs, yet initially score below a stanine of 5 on the STAR, would advance by at least 8 raw score points on a subsequent STAR test in 2010.
c. Expect that immigrant English Language Learners, who have resided in English speaking countries for longer that 5 years, would demonstrate at least a similar rate of progress in reading, to New Zealand born peers.
Expect that all normally progressing students (working within 2 years of their chronological age) advance by at least 2 sub levels during the year, in writing tasks assessed using the e-asTTle indicators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual improvement targets for student achievement – 2009
ACTION PLAN
|
Strategic Goal 2 |
NUMERACY : To embed and sustain the Numeracy programme throughout the school |
|
Annual Targets |
By the end of 2009, 80% of all students will have improved by at least one stanine on the PAT Maths test. This would represent a very significant improvement related to age although a repeat of the test in November cannot be nationally referenced.
|
|
Target Groups
(reported on)
|
Year 8 Students and Year 7 Students (All Year 7 students will also be tested with the full diagnostic test to see what improvements have been made from the IKAN test done at the beginning of the year)
- Students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here)
- Maori Students
- Pacifica Students
- Students at risk
|
|
Historical Position/
Rationale |
· In 2008 all Year 8 students improved by one or more levels on IKAN test, or remained the same. Because the diagnostic test stages stop at different stages (Addition & Subtraction, Forwards Number Word Sequence & Backwards Number Word Sequence at stage 6, Multiplication and Division at stage 7 and remainder at stage 8), it makes it difficult to predict which stages will show the greatest improvement. The Year 7s in 2008 were achieving at stage 6, with a number at stage 7. |
|
Actions |
Timing |
Responsibility |
Resourcing |
|
· Provide professional development in Numeracy to new staff members.
· Maintain Numeracy teaching proficiency through staff meetings Mathematics (staff sharing resources and new ideas) and staff appraisals. |
All year
All year
|
Miss Sangster
Miss Sangster |
$2,500 |
|
Outcome:
Achieved/not achieved/variance report
|
Percentages of the results are as follows (working on the number of students who sat both tests):
|
Lowered stanine |
Stayed the same |
Improved stanine |
|
8% |
30% |
62% |
Although we didn’t achieve the (on hindsight) somewhat optimistic target of 80% of the students improving their stanine, the results were pleasing, particularly in the Year 7s and top Year 8 groups.
Of those whose stanine stayed the same, their raw scores can be shown as:
|
Lowered |
Stayed the same |
Improved |
|
11 |
13 |
27 |
This is because within each stanine there is a range of scores, and where in March the student may have scored at the bottom end of that stanine, they have improved, but not enough to move to the next stanine.
|
|
|
Recommendations:
Where to from here? |
1. By the end of 2010, 75% of all students will have improved by at least one stanine on the PAT Maths test. This would represent a very significant improvement related to age,
2. By the end of 2010, 80% of all students will be scoring at least 90% accuracy on their basic facts tests. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual improvement targets for student achievement – 2010
ACTION PLAN
|
Strategic Goal 1
|
LITERACY :To develop, implement, monitor and review programmes and practices that strengthen literacy throughout the school. |
|
Annual Targets |
Expect that more than 85% of students will achieve a stanine 5 or above on the STAR before the end of the year.
1. Expect that students Maori and Pasifika students will progress at a similar rate to their Pakeha peers, at all achievement levels.
2. Expect that those Maori and Pasifika students, who have no identified learning needs, yet initially score below a stanine of 5 on the STAR, would advance by at least 8 raw score points on a subsequent STAR test in 2010.
3. Expect that immigrant English Language Learners, who have resided in English speaking countries for longer that 5 years, would demonstrate at least a similar rate of progress in reading, to New Zealand born peers.
Expect that all normally progressing students (working within 2 years of their chronological age) advance by at least 2 sub levels during the year, in writing tasks assessed using the e-asTTle indicators.
|
|
Target Groups
(reported on)
|
· All students not new to New Zealand
· Students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here)
· Maori Students
· Pacifica Students
· Students identified as ‘at risk’ |
|
Historical Position/
Rationale |
Due to the multi-cultural nature of our students, academic goals may be expressed in two parts. Part (i) will relate to all students, part (ii) will relate to students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here).
|
|
Actions |
Timing |
Responsibility |
Resourcing |
|
· Teachers will use a wide range of instructional strategies integrating with other curriculum areas as appropriate.
· Teachers will plan interesting and effective writing programmes which actively involve students and address their specific needs.
· Teachers will implement instructional practices which lead to student acquisition of reading and writing skills.
· Teachers will effectively assess reading and writing using a variety of tools to gather, analyse and use the data to assist future planning and learning goals.
· Home – school reading links will be promoted by the programme “Working together – Kia Kotahi Tatou”.
|
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010 |
Mrs. Smith
Mrs. Smith
Mrs. Smith
Mrs. Smith
Mrs. Smith
|
$2,000 |
|
Outcome:
Achieved/not achieved/variance report
|
|
|
|
Recommendations:
Where to from here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual improvement targets for student achievement – 2010
ACTION PLAN
|
Strategic Goal 2 |
NUMERACY : To embed and sustain the Numeracy programme throughout the school |
|
Annual Targets |
1. By the end of 2010, 75% of all students will have improved by at least one stanine on the PAT Maths test. This would represent a very significant improvement related to age,
2. By the end of 2010, 80% of all students will be scoring at least 90% accuracy on their basic facts tests. |
|
Target Groups
(reported on)
|
Year 8 Students and Year 7 Students (All Year 7 students will also be tested with the full diagnostic test to see what improvements have been made from the IKAN test done at the beginning of the year)
- Students new to New Zealand (within five years of being here)
- Maori Students
- Pacifica Students
- Students at risk
|
|
Historical Position/
Rationale |
· In 2008 all Year 8 students improved by one or more levels on IKAN test, or remained the same. Because the diagnostic test stages stop at different stages (Addition & Subtraction, Forwards Number Word Sequence & Backwards Number Word Sequence at stage 6, Multiplication and Division at stage 7 and remainder at stage 8), it makes it difficult to predict which stages will show the greatest improvement. The Year 7s in 2008 were achieving at stage 6, with a number at stage 7. |
|
Actions |
Timing |
Responsibility |
Resourcing |
|
· Provide professional development in Numeracy to new staff members.
· Maintain Numeracy teaching proficiency through staff meetings Mathematics (staff sharing resources and new ideas) and staff appraisals. |
All year
All year
|
Miss Sangster
Miss Sangster |
$400 |
|
Outcome:
Achieved/not achieved/variance report
|
|
|
|
Recommendations:
Where to from here? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Procedural Information: Action timeline 2010
The Board Year - 2010
Term 1
|
When |
What |
Who |
Notes |
January
1 Jan |
Instalment 1 operating funding
|
|
|
3 Feb |
Term 1 begins |
|
|
February
02
06
08
15 - 19 |
Teacher Only Day
Waitangi Day
BOT meeting @7.00pm. Appoint Chairperson
STAR Testing
PAT testing
.
Camp week |
Principal/staff
Chairperson/BOT
Principal
Principal/staff |
|
March
01
05
08
15,16
23
31
|
Complete Roll Return
Roll return due at MOE.
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
Charter: 2010 Targets in place.
Goal setting parent & student interviews
Working together – Home/School meeting
Charter: Analysis of Variance for previous year completed included with Accounts to Auditor (Statutory Requirement) |
Principal/staff
Principal
Chairperson/BOT
Principal
Principal |
Also needs to be signed off by BOT Chair or nominated member.
BOT could consider minuting approval of Draft Annual Report and give Principal/Chairperson authority to sign off. |
April
01
|
Instalment 2 operating funding
End of school Planning cycle (end of month) |
Principal / Staff
Chairperson/principal |
Charter updated for 2010 Annual Plan/Targets, 2009 – 2011.
Copy sent to MOE, Lower Hutt
|
|
01 April |
Term 1 ends |
|
|
Term 2
|
When |
What |
Who |
Notes |
19 April |
Term 2 begins |
|
|
|
May
07
17
31 |
.Principal on Sabbatical for term.
Board election
BOT Meeting @ 7.00pm
4 copies of audited financial statement and Analysis of Variance and list of BOT members to MOE, local office. |
Chairperson/BOT
Chairperson/Principal |
One week later than usual to allow a week after elections. |
June
07
14
|
Queens Birthday
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
Self-review of Terms of Reference & Delegations
Self-review of Terms of NAG 5 Safe Environment
|
Chairperson/BOT
Chairperson/Principal
Safe Environment committee |
|
July
01
02 |
Installment 3 operating funding
July Roll Return submitted
Interim Student Reports home. |
Principal
Principal |
|
|
02 July |
Term 2 ends |
|
|
Term 3
|
When |
What |
Who |
Notes |
19 July |
Term 3 begins |
|
|
July
27-28
|
Parent interviews |
Principal |
|
|
August
09
|
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
Self-review of NAG 3 Personnel
|
Chairperson/BOT
Personnel committee |
|
|
September
06 - 10
13
|
Ski Trip week
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
Self Review NAG 4, Section 1 Property
Notification of provisional staffing and funding for 2011. |
Principal/staff
Chairperson/BOT
Property Committee
BOT |
|
24 Sept |
Term 3 ends |
|
|
Term 4
|
When |
What |
Who |
Notes |
1 October
11 October |
Instalment 4 operating funding
Term 4 begins |
|
|
October
08
18
22
25 |
Last day for review of provisional staffing for 2009.
Beginning work on 2011 budget.
Teacher Only Curriculum Day
Labour Day |
Principal/staff
Principal/Financial Provider
Principal/staff
|
|
November
08
15
Mid November
14 – 19
21` - 26 |
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
STAR testing
Roll Growth
Last day for staffing and funding increases for 2009
End of Year Payroll advice to Pay Serve.
Resolution Bay, Camp 1
Resolution Bay, Camp 2 (If needed) |
Chairperson/BOT
Principal
Principal |
|
December
13 Dec
15
|
Start of year Payroll advice to Pay Serve.
BOT meeting @ 7.00pm
Prize-giving (afternoon)
Reports to parents
|
Principal
Chairperson/BOT
Principal
|
Confirm 2010 Budget
Report on Literacy and Numeracy targets. |
15 Dec |
Last Day of school year. |
|
Supporting Documents
2010 budget
|
|